Advert
Previous Posts in Interviews
- BYT Interview: Yelle Yelle Yelle!!!!
- Interview Redux: Wire
- BYT Interview: Girl Talk
- BYT Interview: Love Is All
- BYT interview: Tig Notaro
- BYT Interview: Evangelicals
- SPX Interview: Jim Rugg
- BYT Interview: Mugison
- Dionne Warwick Loves Cake
- BYT interview: Juan MacLean
- Uncorked DC: Autumn Wines
- BYT Interview: Talking to Takka Takka
- These Are Powers Listening Party/Interview
- BYT Interview: Rachael Yamagata
- BYT Interview: Peter Salett
- BYT Interview/Listening Party: True Womanhood
- Interview: Shea Van Horn & Matt Bailer
- Labeled: The Kora Records
- Crises Uncompromised: GRAY Matter, A BYT Interview
- BYT Interview: Taking a Walk with the Walkmen
- BYT Interview: Spindrift
- Learning to Walk Away with Juliana Hatfield
- BYT Interview: Gist
- BYT Interview: Dr. Dog
- BYT Interview: Federico Aubele
- BYT Interview: Nizam Ali of Ben’s Chili Bowl
- BYT Interview: Trace Crutchfield
- BYT Interview: Bodies of Water
- BYT Interview: Pepi Ginsberg
- BYT Interview: The Melvins
- Higher Highs and Lower Lows with Grizzly Bear: A BYT Interview
- Interview: Andy Butler of Hercules and Love Affair
- Marcell and the Truth
- BYT Interview: We Are Scientists
- Revisiting the Alluring Mystery of No Wave Part 2: A BYT interview with Thurston Moore
- BYT Interview: Bowerbirds
- Revisiting the Alluring Mystery of No Wave Part 1: A BYT interview with Byron Coley
- Interview: MGMT
- Interview: The Coits
- BYT Interview in Progress: Ruby Suns
- Interview Redux: The Dirtbombs
- Space Is The Place — Interview with Telemetrik
- BYT Interview: THRUSHES
- BYT Interview: Beach House
- BYT Interview: The Watson Twins
- The Many Shades of Mahogany: A BYT Interview with Andrew Prinz
- Black & White Jacksons Listening Party
- Get Hammonded
- BYT Interview: Lorelei
- BYT Interview: The Dutchess & The Duke
BYT Interview: The Black Kids
May 14, 2008 by william alberque
Send to a Friend
The Black Kids (opening for Cut Copy on Thursday, May 15, 2008, at the Black Cat) are a direct-from-blog phenomenon, drawing rapturous critical praise last year from their self-produced, web-distributed demo (the Wizard of Ahhhs EP) last year. The jump from MySpace to Columbia Records can be traced to their break-out performance, at the Athens Popfest in August 2007. That performance saw the white-hot light of attention brought to this marvelous five-piece from Jacksonville, Florida.

Reggie Youngblood, the loquacious and extremely personable lead singer of the band, told me why that event was so crucial.
“You can only ask so much of Jacksonville,” he said in a husky voice, tired, seemingly,
from the pace of the past few months. “There are only a certain number of people predisposed to our music, and they can only be expected to go out so many times.”
Reggie appeared in no fewer than four previous bands before reaching this level of recognition and success with the Black Kids.
“Every and I’ve been in, I thought was wonderful and should have been successful. We used to get so indignant about our lack of success, but we were playing the same two bars in Jacksonville over and over. We had to step out of that idiom if we were to change things. I can think of several of our friends’ bands who should have made it big long before us, but they never stepped outside.”
He explained that “a friend of ours basically bullied us into sticking our heads out of our little hole and talking a chance. So, we pressed our CD-Rs of the demo, headed to Athens, and, in our opinion, had a pretty off-night, performance-wise. The rest, well…”
History.
In the wake of their succès fou in Athens, they were contacted by Quest Management, whose other clients include the Arcade Fire and Björk.
“My initial reply was, ‘fuck you;’ I didn’t believe them, but they persisted, and after some chats on the phone, we agreed to work together. They successfully seduced me,” he laughed.
I joined him in that. Reggie is remarkably personable, and his easy laugh came more frequently with a sharp wit as we continued.
The band, under the encouragement and with the support of their management team, found a label in the UK, Almost Gold (joining Peter, Björn and John and Does It Offend You, Yeah?) , and quickly decamped to cold, rainy London early in 2008.
“It was wonderful, at first,” he reminisced. My sister Ali (also in the band) and I were Navy brats, living in places like the Philippines, but that was eons ago. The weather was so novel and interesting at first - all of us in big coats and scarves and hoods, but after two months, we were anxious to get back to the sunshine and warmth of home.”
That wasn’t the only challenge of the long weeks of recording and touring that followed.
“The UK tour was a real trial for us, stuck in a van in close quarters. Typically, I like to give my friends plenty of space. Also, Ali and I are not the kind of siblings to hang out - though it was having a good reason to see each other more. The worst part was in that kind of proximity, you have to be far more aware of yourself, your actions and your impact on others. It made me realize that I’m not a very good person!”
Fortunately, the long-standing bonds between Kevin Snow (drums), Owen Holmes (bass), Dawn Watley (vocals and keyboards) and his sister (also vocals and keyboards) seem to have held together.
Indeed, their time in cold and wet London was well spent, recording their debut album with Suede’s legendary guitarist, Brendan Butler.
“That was Quest’s idea, I think. It was amazing. We came in with some songs and ideas, but he added so much perspective. Some of us are massive Suede fans, and I was aware he had produced the Libertines, so we couldn’t imagine what he wanted from us!”
The results so far sound interesting, though.
I hesitate to bring up that the single version of “I’m Not Going to Teach Your Boyfriend How to Dance with You,” released in April 2008 by Almost Gold, lacks the delirious spontaneity of the original demo.
Still, it reached #11 in the UK charts, and is soon to be followed by another gem from the Wizard EP, “Hurricane Jane.”
Reggie tells me, without a hit of braggadocio, “we structured an album with ten singles on it, so it’s been all arguments about what to release next. These first two singles were obvious to all of us,
though.”
Obvious, because “Boyfriend” is the kind of song bands dream about recording.
“Having a hit single is pretty awesome, amazing, weird. It happened and suddenly we got a call that we were in the UK top twenty. It wasn’t at all how I expected it to be – we all just sort of nodded at each other. There was no party, no champagne fountain, but we were all so happy.”
Kate Nash famously recorded a cover of it on a French radio program, contacting the band through MySpace to ask, retroactively, if it was all right.
“It’s amazing when you consider that song was constructed while I was working in a call center, in my little cubicle, and painstakingly recorded. Then her guitarist heard it, played it for her, and she played it on the radio in France.”
“Boyfriend”s bsides are both covers, “Damn, I Wish I Was Your Lover,” originally recorded by Sophie B. Hawkins, and “You Turn Me on” by the Beat Happening. “Turn” is a decidedly odd confection, with Reggie wailing like Bauhaus-era Peter Murphy in a sea of reverb, and a keyboard line set to the “squiggly” setting.
“Damn,” is more recognizable as the ‘Kids, with a huge, sing-a-long chorus – an excellent take on the original.
“We didn’t have a lot of time to make the b sides,” Reggie explained, “and we recorded them ourselves, so we had to teach ourselves a lot about the recording process along the way. We came up with a few new originals that might appear on the b side of the next single, though,” he teased.
Spoiler alert: “You Only Call Me When You’re Crying,” and “Power in the Blood” will back
the “Hurricane” single.
Asked who he’d like to work with next, in production, he’s immediately ready with an answer: “Andre 3000! Or perhaps whoever produced “Let It Die” by Feist [Renaud Letang and
Peaches' boyfriend Gonzales?]. I think that would be very interesting!”
“Hurricane” is gorgeous but far slower, harkening to Reggie’s love of the more obscure but intelligent music he loves so well, like Momus, Hefner and Felt.
With the supreme confidence of unbridled talent, wit and charm, he replied, “if it’s not a hit, I have it on good authority that the apocalypse will occur soon afterwards.”
Fair enough, Reggie, fair enough.

Want more:
Befriend The Black Kids on the spacer
see them live at the Cat tomorrow
and then hang out at our afterparty, well, after the show
I didn’t believe in guitars until Bernard…
May 14, 2008 at 10:05 amWOOT!WOOT!
May 14, 2008 at 10:23 amYay Black Kids. I have been keeping my eye on them for awhile. I wouldn’t be surprised if they headline on their next swing through DC.
May 14, 2008 at 10:29 amWill I still love Black Kids when they don’t sound like they were recorded from five blocks away? Jury is out…
May 14, 2008 at 10:51 amJohn,
The deepest of ironies is that they recorded the B-sides to their two new singles themselves, and “Damn, I Wish I Was Your Lover,” sounds just as excellent (though not as “recorded from five blocks away”) as the Wizard EP. My guess is that Bernard, for all his legendary prowess, was less than an ideal producer, but, as their chart showing indicates, not entirely deleterious to their appeal.
May 14, 2008 at 11:18 ami wish this band was allowed to be underground. pitchfork is blowing bands up before their ripe. Black Kids are a cute band but we used to allow bands a couple of albums before they became exposed to the major media markets.
but right now, Pitchfork is ALL there is as far as tastemakers go. Now, this is the fault of Spin and Rolling STone and others for allowing themselves to become completely irrelevant.
food for thought; The music industry has changed (or died, whatever) and yet, even though so much about it is differnt, one thing remains exactly the same: the bands have no power. before the power was the labels, now it’s the critics. I humbly submit that this is just as explotivie.
May 14, 2008 at 12:14 pmspelling error, that’s “before they’re ripe”
May 14, 2008 at 12:16 pmEverybody’s ‘black’ these days. Black Keys, Black Angels, Black Hollies… I think more people should follow Prince’s lead and adopt symbols for band names. Maybe that way shitty new bands like this can die in obscurity because nobody can pronounce their name to write scathing reviews of their piss-poor adolescent pseudo-musical drivel.
May 14, 2008 at 1:31 pmSpeaking of the Black Hollies, they just signed on for my upcoming event.
May 14, 2008 at 2:00 pmPitchfork isn’t the problem. It’s the dipshits that look to Pitchfork. Never trust an english major writing about music when it comes to listening to music. Sites like this are the 24 hour cable news of the music industry. Gotta fill time, first and foremost, so the filter is open wide.
May 14, 2008 at 2:17 pm“Never trust an english major writing about music when it comes to listening to music. ”
Quoted For Truth
May 14, 2008 at 2:39 pmDan, how…insightful. GTFO.
May 14, 2008 at 2:39 pm“never trust…” is funny, but leaves unaddressed the obvious question - who should write about music? in what context? the idea that the internet provides too much attention too quickly to new bands is similarly vexing. really? as if laboring in quiet obscurity for years is better? Ask reggie – he’s 27? 28? been in four other bands, each of which had time away from the spotlight to…fail miserably.
I think labels put pressure on bands to come up with product to quickly, but that’s always been the case (c.f., sophomore album syndrome, a problem that predates the internet). And, as for bands being put into the studio before they have enough songs for an album proper, or before they’re ready for such an ordeal – really, you think this is a new problem? And, caused by pitchfork and other websites? Good lord, look at how many bands have a great debut single or ep or two, and a crap debut album (Beta Band, anyone?). it’s always been this.
Besides, are there people who seriously base their taste on what a magazine or website tells them to like? that’s ridiculous, but was the case 30 years ago with old media publications such as rolling stone, as much as it is today with new media such as pitchfork. each employs dozens of writers, any of which could have good, bad, or indifferent taste, as well as good, bad or indifferent writing. saying, “pitchfork likes this band,” in that context, has no meaning. therefore, anyone saying to themselves, “well, pitchfork likes this band, so i should,” is a breathtakingly strange proposition, and evidence of an odd sort of intellectual laziness.
the nme “liked” the long blondes, in that they took an editorial stance to back them when they emerged in sheffield. then, the review of their latest album pilloried it. does that mean “the nme doesn’t like the long blondes?” well, it’s interesting that they published a negative review by one writer, but it still might be the majority, or even the editorial view, that the band is quality. that can only emerge over time. Nme does have a well-documented history of publishing critical reviews of second albums by bands they previously championed. But neither “the nme likes” nor “the nme dislikes” a particular band should have any real meaning to the reader. Individual reviewers certainly have my trust (for instance, one of the previous editors of the “what’s on the nme stereo” column whose taste I particularly loved), but the nme imprimatur is hardly necessary or sufficient for me to give a shit about any band.
frankly, i like the way the internet has opened music observation by more people to a wider audience. before the internet, it was difficult, nay, impossible, to hear about bands from the far reaches of the world if the predominant music magazines didn’t write about them. now, one must deploy one’s own filter to decide whether individual reviewers are good or crap, usually based on reading their other reviews. just like with old media. nothing’s really changed except the scope of what’s available, both in music available, and reviewers writing about it. And the ubiquity of downloading allows me to try before I buy, again without relying on a few radio stations available in my hometown to act as gatekeepers. Now, the number of gatekeepers is approaching the number of possible consumers.
the only people who really lose out are those who are not able to discern or discriminate good from bad, what they like from what they don’t, or are prey to the opinions of others over their own. They find the near-bewlidering level of choice available as intimidating or counter-productive. for the rest of us, we can revel in not having to rely on john peel (though he was a demi-god for his efforts to bring excellent music to the masses), jon savage, mark jenkins, et al, to expose us to new music. we can be more proactive, if we choose.
certainly, the instant global reach of the internet and the democratic nature of blogs means that some bands are thrust too quickly into the spotlight, but, again, this has always been the case (c.f., suede on the cover of the nme before recording their debut). this is not a new phenomenon. in fact, one has the opportunity to sample such a wide variety of opinions about any new band that i think i can have a far better picture of what’s truly available than ever before.
so, i disagree strongly with the idea that the web is killing music, new bands, or music criticism. it’s providing more information, some of it good, some of it bad, and leaving it to us to decide.
May 14, 2008 at 3:27 pmWilliam, please stop wasting a perfectly good BYT post in a comment.
May 14, 2008 at 3:52 pmI have no dog in the fight above…but I’d like to say that the new launch of BYT which allows comments to be featured on the homepage is great. I didn’t see William’s post, but I saw Cale’s post…which I clicked on and then read William’s post. It works.
May 14, 2008 at 4:03 pmStay tuned for even more comment updates!
May 14, 2008 at 4:27 pmCut Copy in DC sold out, boo
was hoping to pick up tickets tonight
wish there was a giveaway for the DC show instead of B’more
everyone is entitled to their opinion about what is good and what’s not. it’s that simple - but the majority of people tend to do as they’re told aka through the media such as the aforementioned spin and ’stone.
i like the black kids, i also found out about them simply based on their name. i saw them on the cat’s schedule and looked them up, liked them, and now i’m going to the show. it’s unfortunate that more people lack the curiosity to discover music on their own.
May 14, 2008 at 9:35 pmTo clarify my previous smart assed post:
I’ll agree wholeheartedly with William in that the internet is the best thing that’s happened to music in 30 years. That being said, since independent websites/blogs/reviewers now have the power to shine a light on who they think deserves attention… why are we still writing about new young bands who just got signed to major labels? A&R people get paid to pressure the media to give these kids the spotlight, so why do I need to read about them on independent web sites? Maybe this isn’t one?
There are dozens if not hundreds of legitimately unknown bands who “deserve” recognition as much as the Black Kids, and while I realize it’s regionally newsworthy due to their pending show, I would appreciate a fresh point of view on music instead of a rehash of “the next big band you haven’t heard of” interview/ review… so says Columbia Records.
May 15, 2008 at 10:10 amGreatly appreciate the update comment, Dan.
I heard about them by some careful research post-Athens, but pre-signing. Was gratified by their excellent EP. Shocked and a little dismayed at their signing to Columbia, but Reggie’s explanation assuaged my fears.
That said, proof is in the pudding. I think each of the four songs on their demo EP is stellar. Not just good, but stellar. Their re-recording of “Boyfriend” is a bit of a big-budget let down (as were all GoodBooks re-recordings of “Smalltown Girl”), but the two other songs I’ve heard - the bsides to the UK “Boyfriend” single have been good, especially, “Damn, I Wish I Was Your Lover.”
Now, will they come out with an album as sublime and ground-breaking as, say, “Spirit of Eden?” Probably not. But, if it’s got a couple new great songs on it, and some slightly disappointing re-visits to the “Wizard” EP tracks, it’ll still be head-and-shoulders over most recent indie-pop records.
May 15, 2008 at 10:28 amwilliam alberque - well said!! That should be on the front page.
May 15, 2008 at 7:54 pmEverybody — if you’re not interested in this band, move on! Aren’t there millions of other bands you don’t like? Go read interviews by Trapt or Miley Cyrus and devote your time to bashing them–because after all, you’re devoting your time on this board, and any amount of disdain and time wasted to display that disdain on this site makes you just that much more pathetic.
May 16, 2008 at 10:59 amTheir show last night was really fucking good. At least all this ink is being spilled over a band that merits the attention.
May 16, 2008 at 1:40 pm

Racist!
May 14, 2008 at 9:35 am