Previous Posts in Live DC

Live & Vote DC: Hillary Clinton @ Washington & Lee High School

Live & Vote DC: Hillary Clinton @ Washington & Lee High School

February 11, 2008 by Rachel Eisley Send to a Friend Send to a Friend

with Virginia primaries being tomorrow and with the presidential race being all that anyone is talking about, Rachel bravely set out to see what both Hillary and Barack had to say to the youth of the tri-state area. And also took some great pictures.

Here goes:
IMG_6633

As a person who grew up in Arlington, I am all too aware of the District of Columbia’s vast political arena despite having little vested interest in politics myself, besides adequately researching my choice of candidate before any local or national election. Just across the Potomac River lies the vast political miasma, the constant hustle reaching a veritable din of white noise that encompasses every aspect of the city of buildings shorter than the US capitol. Despite these short buildings, there is no shortage of political personages, giving the district its reputation for boring, boxy suits and blaring white tennis shoes inappropriately paired with said suits. One of the more famous politicos graced the gym of Arlington County’s Washington Lee High school on the afternoon of February 7th, 2008 with her very mighty presence (and elegant suit, sans tennis shoes.)

IMG_6829

Well, by the time she finished speaking, it had become evening since she was more than 2 hours late to her appointment with 1500 teenagers, most too young to vote, but extremely excited about the electoral process anyway (this I gauged from the expert science of estimating cheer decibel levels and the amount of times the adolescent audience did “the wave.”) Grandly accompanied by the sheriff of Arlington County (also a fine example of a strong female leader, Beth Arthur) and a flank of Secret Service agents, Hillary Clinton entered the school gym welcomed by cheers and screams of rock star proportions. Beth herself remarked that she almost thought she was introducing Bon Jovi judging from the cheering (although I’m sure the allusion was lost to the students.) When Hillary started her address, however, all eyes were riveted to her. Students (and teachers) who had given up their early release day to sit captive in the gym for what turned out to be 3 hours total (everyone had to be seated an hour before she was scheduled to appear) provided the most attentive and responsive audience I’ve seen in quite some time. I was proud to see more than several students and teachers from the neighboring high school where I work my 9-5, who stood in line outside for over an hour before getting in.
IMG_6818 IMG_6687 IMG_6663 IMG_6758

Before I get into the contents of her speech, I’d like to say that I was pretty surprised at how adamantly her campaign announcers introduced her. She was not, “Senator Hillary Clinton: candidate for the office of President” but “Senator Hillary Clinton: The next president of the United States!” And yes, she was obviously there to promote herself, but the audience was pretty captive, and there was no mention of a John McCain or Barak Obama address to even things out. I would think that in a public school, there would have been more of an attempt to congratulate the students on participating in the presidential process in general, not just in their support of one candidate. I’ve heard Arlington be referred to as “The People’s Republic of Arlington” (to poke fun at its stereotypical and systematic liberalness, which is of course extremely uncharacteristic of Virginia as a whole). My cautionary thoughts on this matter stem from my role as a high school guidance counselor, since I’ve been taught that it’s very important not to endorse particular beliefs or causes with students, and that the role of the public school employee is to nurture independent thought on such issues, apart from personal opinion on behalf of the adult.
IMG_6676 IMG_6711-2 IMG_6748

That aside, Hillary’s speech in and of itself was very inspirational, and addressed many of the pressing issues facing Americans today. Some of her proposed changes to our current state of affairs:

Bring the troops home from Iraq within 60 days of her taking office

Strengthen the middle class

Fix the economy which is now approaching recession

End dishonest home mortgage loans and high interest on student loans

Balance the budget

Eliminate No Child Left Behind (which is certainly not very popular in Arlington County from what I could gather from the applause of the teachers and upper level administrators who were sitting near me. NCLB is a federal program supposedly in place to make sure every public school reaches every student, but has ended up placing too much of an emphasis on standardized testing, and has not following through with promised fiscal support the schools with lower test scores.)

Make college affordable again

Provide health care for everyone by extending the Congressional health plan to uninsured Americans

Ensure mental health care coverage, and preventative health care

End tax cuts for the wealthy

End tax cuts for companies that outsource jobs

End dependence on foreign oil

Cut into extreme profits held by oil companies

IMG_6822

I did end up finding myself excited and even put down my camera to clap at several points, but also found myself wondering, how will this all be paid for? I understand that ending tax cuts for the wealthy would add some money to the budget, and America is spending quite a lot on the war in Iraq so if the war was ended, that would add some money as well, but is that enough? While I agree with the fact that every American should be insured, this universal coverage has to be expensive. When Hillary becomes president, will even more of my already substantially taxed paycheck become more so? I suppose that the nature of the speech which clocked in around a half hour, limited the amount of explanations she could give. I would say with the exception of her position on gay marriage which was not discussed, she did touch on most of the pressing issues of this election. She refrained from mentioning anything about fellow democrat Barak Obama, other than to say that she was a candidate with “experience” which seemed like a hint towards less experienced Barak. She did say several negative things about the current administration, mentioning how inefficient George W Bush has managed the budget, from entering into office with a balanced budget plus surplus, to now being greatly in debt. She also associated the current administration with oil tycoons. She also expounded on several ways in which her presidential bid differs from that of John McCain.

Hillary said John McCain would keep troops in Iraq for 10 years vs. her 60 days, and she quoted McCain as saying he didn’t know much about the economy.
IMG_6716

Overall, Hillary’s address was a proven success. Her audience enjoyed themselves (especially after their patience for waiting 1.5 hours was restored by a charismatic campaign worker who threw free t-shirts into the crowd). Although I think that having a more balanced event featuring a candidate from both the democrats and republicans would have been more appropriate for the public school venue, none of the students present will ever forget Hillary’s speech. She was encouraging and inspirational, and all of the students I spoke with during the event were super excited to be there, not only to support Hillary herself, but to participate in the political process. Despite my general non-interest in the nitty-gritty of politics, I was thankful to have shared in the event, and felt newly energized for the upcoming election.

The Maryland, Virginia and DC primaries are this Tuesday, February 12th. I’m still not sure who I’ll vote for, but at least I have a portrait of Hillary outside of the media’s collection of sound bites and contrived photo ops.

Send to a Friend Send to a Friend

Sexy Fitsum Says:

last night I overheard some folks talking about Hilary Clinton’s appearance at a local highschool. Wondering if it was this one. Apparently Clinton was running late so staffers filled the gap by pumping up the audience with changing and lobbing Hillary t-shirts at them. When a staffer yelled out “Who’s the next president of the United States?” a large group of kids yelled back “Obama!”

February 11, 2008 at 11:18 am
andrew Says:

Oh dear god. BYT does politics. Oh god.

February 11, 2008 at 11:22 am
Becca Says:

the Maryland primary is also tomorrow.

February 11, 2008 at 11:43 am
Svetlana Says:

added.
apologies for that.

also-Barack’s rally report later today.
Rachel got to sit on the stage and whatnot.

February 11, 2008 at 11:52 am
Michael Says:

Anyone who thinks that the next President will bring the troops home in 60, 90, or even 180- days is naive. Anyone who thinks that they should be brought home at this current state in the game (such as it is) is a moron (Please don’t come in to argue with me about how we shouldn’t be in Iraq. Hello? Duh. But we are.) Anyone who thinks that Hillary especially would bring the troops home in 60 days needs to come over and buy my ultra rare collection of bath towels that were originally used by Catherine the Great to wipe the horse cum off her mouth after she got finished in the barn.

This year promises to offer us the worst Presidential choices in our nation’s history.

We have a woman who has done very little but can creatively come up with “35 years experience” Well shit. I’ve got 36 years experience in Television Broadcasting because I’ve watched it that long. Hire me to run NBC.

We have a guy who gave a creative speech a few years ago (and the left thought: oooh well spoken black man! Manna from heaven! (which is racist as fuck but they will never admit it) and then spent the majority of his first real National job lobbying for another job - (can I get that gig? Seriously? I want to get paid to look for work).

We’ve got a former POW who was treated like a little bitch by the Bush fellas back in 2000 in SC and who then rolled over and gave them the best blow jobs of their lives (he’s also hated by other former POWs and I’ve heard some of the most hardened Special Forces right wingers say they’d vote for Hillary over McCain).

And I don’t know who the other nutjobs on the Republican side are because they don’t matter - McCain’s got the Nomination.

They all fucking suck and I mean that with much more gravitas than I normally mean something “fucking sucks”

Seriously (and this is not a dig at the reviewer, none of this is in fact), I don’t understand how people can not walk away from political speeches inspired. That’s what they’re there for - to promise you shit so they get elected when all along they’re counting on you to not remember the shit they promised so they can go on doing the same thing they’ve been doing all along - collecting power for the sake of power.

I mean does anyone remember the laundry list of promises the Democrats promised us a couple years ago when they took charge of both the House and the Senate?

Anyone want to do a check-list of what they actually got done?

Didn’t think so.

My sincere suggestion for anyone voting in Primaries is to vote for Ron Paul. Not because you believe in him and want him as President, but because he’s a viable third party candidate and this country desperately needs a third party.

February 11, 2008 at 12:02 pm
George Townsend Says:

What a waste of bandwidth (and oxygen).

February 11, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

except Ron Paul is running as a republican and will drop out soon. also inspite of his plusses, he’s a racist — “I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal” — hates gays, and jews. the last point makes him pretty unelectable.

Viable third and fourth parties are inevitabilities; the Green party will grow and become more impactful (glad that Nader decided not to fuck it up for the Dems this time around) and the formation of some christian conservative party will come sooner than later.

February 11, 2008 at 12:51 pm
Marty Soshel Says:

The people have spoken; no more politics on the website that we go to escape the mind numbing boredom of our political jobs.

Anyone remember the last time The Scissor Sisters played DC? They stopped mid-set and decided to do a ‘let’s talk politics’ moment with the crowd. Now, I’m sure this made sense to them; they’re in DC, why not talk some politics right? the things was, they almost got booed, and this is from a crowd that obviously adored them. Point is, we all live this shit, the last thing we want to do when we’re hanging out is here about it.

That being said, let me say this:
(sung to the tune of “I am proud to be an american”)

I am proud to be an American
Where at least I know Ron Paul
And I won’t forget the men who died
Who gave Rob Paul to me
And I’ll gladly stand up next to you and defend Ron Paul today
Cause they’re ain’t no doubt I love Ron Paul
Ron Paul 08

February 11, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

In the above quote Ron Paul is referring to black males in D.C.

February 11, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Marty Soshel Says:

see damnit, fitsum, this is why we shouldn’t be talking politics on byt, cause now i have to respond…

the incident you were talking about were memos written from a staffer, clinton, obama, edwards, all had similar problems this cycle.

did he do it? nobody knows. did he think it? nobody knows.

from CNN

In his interview with CNN, Paul said that’s language he would never use. “People who know me, nobody is going to believe this,” he said. “That’s just not my language. It’s not my life.”

He added, “Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Ghandi, they’re the heroes [of my life].”

Matt Welch, the editor-in-chief of “Reason” magazine who shares some of Paul’s beliefs on big government, says he has never heard the congressman make racist comments like those in the newsletters.

“What I think some people are looking for him to do is to say, ‘OK, who wrote that?’ I mean, there’s 20 years, give or take, worth of newsletters there,” Welch said.

Paul said the editor of publications “is responsible for daily activities.” But he also cited “transition” and “changes” and said that some people were hired to write stories “but I didn’t know their names.”

The presidential hopeful described the newsletter revelations as a “rehash” of old material dug up by his opponents because he is gaining ground with black voters due to his stance against the war in Iraq and the war on drugs.

“I am the anti-racist because I am the only candidate — Republican or Democrat — who would protect the minority against these vicious drug laws,” he said.

“Libertarians are incapable of being a racist, because racism is a collectivist idea.”

February 11, 2008 at 1:27 pm
pedro Says:

As shallow insipid Gen Xers (and worse) I think we can all agree on one thing, Obama is the only sexy candidate.

OBAMA FOR EMPEROR!!!!!

February 11, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Stu Says:

Ron Paul is a racist. Don’t be fooled. He is also anti-choice.

February 11, 2008 at 2:44 pm
eduardo ignasio Says:

“I mean does anyone remember the laundry list of promises the Democrats promised us a couple years ago when they took charge of both the House and the Senate?” - good point. talk is cheap.

and michael is right - we ARE in iraq even though we shouldn’t be there and leaving a mess would be worse than going in in the first place. and no one can possibly get us out as fast as these lying fucking politicians say. why the hell is this a story on BYT, anyway? come on. cover *this* after covering pantsless metro rides? seriously. but since it’s up, i will say that it is a shame that we have the pool of candidates that we do. these soulless politicians like hillary are in it for nothing but their own ambition and they all suck. i’m choosing what i consider to be the least of the evils.

February 11, 2008 at 3:17 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

Marty, the race thing is just one of many questions that pop up if you look a little closer at Ron Paul. And really Ron Paul lipping some boilerplate line about “heroes” of color doesn’t distinguish him from any contemporary republican.

Whether I’m right or wrong about Ron Paul, I don’t see what that has to do with talking politics here.

February 11, 2008 at 3:22 pm
norwegianwood Says:

OMG, PREZIDENT HILLARY!!

thatta girl hilz. i wish the media at large would choose actually, you know, normal photos of her (like these) instead of constantly selecting the worst possible photos no matter what with such blatant sexism. i’m so sick of seeing/hearing everyone bash her for no reason whatsoever. the men are given so much leeway, and the women [woman] are [is] expected to look perfect all the time.

February 11, 2008 at 3:25 pm
Michael Says:

Stu - Paul is not anti-choice, he is pro-state’s rights which means he feels it should be at the state, and not the federal level.

As do I.

I mean fuck, if everything is federal why have state representatives and senators, why have state governments? why have State constitutions.

If Florida wants to outlaw abortion and Georgia wants to allow it, then people can move, and also choose not to visit those states that enact policies they disagree with, which is billions in tourist dollars they’d lose out on.

February 11, 2008 at 5:02 pm
stu Says:

“As an O.B. doctor of thirty years, and having delivered 4,000 babies, I can assure you life begins at conception. I am legally responsible for the unborn, no matter what I do, so there’s a legal life there. The unborn has inheritance rights, and if there’s an injury or a killing, there is a legal entity. There is no doubt about it. ” - Source: 2007 GOP Values Voter Presidential Debate Sep 17, 2007

“The first thing we have to do is get the federal government out of it. We don’t need a federal abortion police. That’s the last thing that we need. There has to be a criminal penalty for the person that’s committing that crime. And I think that is the abortionist. As for the punishment, I don’t think that should be up to the president to decide.” - same source

Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida Nov 28, 2007

From NARAL Pro-choice: “Rep. Paul has an anti-choice record.”

I’d say it’s pretty safe to state that Ron Paul is anti-choice.

February 11, 2008 at 5:30 pm
still nihilistic Says:

“If Florida wants to outlaw abortion and Georgia wants to allow it, then people can move, and also choose not to visit those states that enact policies they disagree with, which is billions in tourist dollars they’d lose out on.”

pftt. so if a 14-year old girl wants to abort in a state that is pro-life it has to move? If a young women with drug problems and no income wants to abort it has to move? If a rape victim wants to abort it has to move too? And what about the parents of the 4-month old fetus who discover will have a terrible genetic defect which make a likley short life to hell? They all should move?

This is the most retarded policy proposal I heard of in a long time.

February 11, 2008 at 8:04 pm
5 Things Says:

[...] are two articles written by a woman at our school about the recent political ralliesin Virginia.  What is interesting is the negative reaction from some of the site’s citizens, [...]

February 11, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Michael Says:

Nihilistic “it”? You call young women “its” more than once? And I’m retarded?

It puts the lotion in the basket…

Most of your sentences don’t make any sense. Go back to Germany.


Stu - you are correct that as an individual he is pro-life but then again so is Bush, and he hasn’t done anything on the issue, nor could he.

Paul is the only politician in the race with a voting record that backs up what he says - the ONLY one.

Whether you agree with that record or not is one thing, but damnit it should mean something that we’re going to vote for people who outright lie and then vote a different way, figuring no one gives enough of a fuck to call them on it.

February 11, 2008 at 10:47 pm
Cale Says:

Michael - poor sentence structure or not, it makes a valid point…

February 12, 2008 at 12:08 am
Michael Says:

Cale - I believe that a whole fuckload of us (its?) need a whole fuckload more of personal responsibility.

It was ignoring my main point which was that there’d be very few states that would actually enact sweeping abortion bans - oh some may outright ban it at first, and a few will keep the laws that mean minors have to have parental approval (meaning the 14 year old it in the first scenario is still in trouble (did it know that many states require parental notification?) and still other states will allow those from states bordering them to enter and have their abortions there.

But I still believe it should be a state issue. It will be, eventually as RvW will be successfully challenged. Then what?

Of course I believe most things should be state issues and our babysitting National Government should mostly go away.

February 12, 2008 at 7:10 am
Stu Says:

Michael - I see what you are saying. Except you are wrong.

You forgot about the Supreme Court. President Bush has appointed 2 anti-choice justices and has dramatically changed the make up otf the courts. As a result the SC has issued horrible rulings on the environment, affirmative action and CHOICE.

When a candidate says that he will appoint Supreme Court nominees in the mold of Scalia and Thomas. They are saying they will nominate an anti-choice judge. Ron Paul has said that.

Now, I know you said he believes it is a states issue, but he wouldmn’t have control over that. It’s in the courts hand.

Anyhow, this whole back and forth is pointless anyways. He has pretty much accepted defeat. THANK GOODNESS.

February 12, 2008 at 2:02 pm
Michael Says:

Stu on your last point I agree - this is pointless.

As far as abortion is concerned, to be honest I could give a fuck either way.

It’s a woman’s issue. If a girl I slept with became pregnant and I felt the right choice was to be for her to have an abortion, I have no say in the matter and can be paying for that night of hump for 18 years if she wants to keep the child -er, wait, keep the “it”

Conversely, if a girl I slept with became pregnant and I wanted her to keep the child/it and then I’d raise it (or I wanted her to put it up for adoption to help someone who couldn’t have kids) I would also have no say so.

So color me completely unconcerned. The only time the abortion policy in the US is beneficial to guys is when both the guy AND the girl agree that an abortion is the best route to take.

Now the ban on two-stroke motors in the US has me really pissed.

February 12, 2008 at 3:00 pm