Photos: Evil Disco / Mousetrap 10.13.2007

 

Previous Posts in Photos

Photos: Evil Disco / Mousetrap 10.13.2007

October 15, 2007 by Cale Send to a Friend Send to a Friend

Saturday night at The Cat: Mousetrap upstairs with the lovely ladies of My Favorite Dress guest DJing, and Evil Disco on the backstage, which as usual was mostly filled with people fist pumping and singing loudly instead of actually dancing.  Not that I’m complaining.  Oh, and some girl got naked.  First off, we have some shots from Pat Jarrett, the newest member of our crack photography team:

 evil disco evil disco 

evil disco evil disco

evil disco evil disco

evil disco 

evil disco evil disco

 evil disco evil disco

evil disco  evil disco 

evil disco evil disco 

 evil disco evil disco

evil disco evil disco

evil disco  evil disco

And since Mousetrap DJ Mark Zimin nicely asked me to, here’s an old school point and shoot set, just like the old days when we weren’t all on the verge of being fired from our 9-5’s by spending so much time on BYT.

 IMG_7868 IMG_7880

IMG_7876 IMG_7881

IMG_7888 IMG_7878

IMG_7872 IMG_7871

IMG_7870 IMG_7873

IMG_7883 IMG_7884

IMG_7886 IMG_7885

IMG_7893 IMG_7897  

IMG_7899 IMG_7900

IMG_7915 

IMG_7908 IMG_7912

IMG_7913 IMG_7879

IMG_7909 IMG_7923 

IMG_7914 IMG_7918 

IMG_7922 IMG_7924 

IMG_7927 IMG_7934

IMG_7896   IMG_7906       

And last, but dear god certainly not least, Sexy Fitsum’s take on the night:

_________ _ _________ _ _________ _
_________ _ _________ _
_________ _ _________ _
_________ _ _________ _
_________ _ _________ _ _________ _
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ _________ _
_________ _   
_________ _ _________ _ 
_________ _ _________ _ _________ _
_________ _ 
    
 
 

Send to a Friend Send to a Friend

ECC Says:

Do I detect a halfsmile on Grace?

October 15, 2007 at 10:07 am
John Says:

The one night I actually decide to go to a gay bar and I regret it.

October 15, 2007 at 10:31 am
theholidaygirl Says:

I think the letters “NSFW” should be required to be included in the introduction if nipples are coming. In a great big font. I totally missed the “some girl got naked” part & nearly spit out my latte/screamed when I was surprised by them.

Thanks to everybody who came out!

October 15, 2007 at 10:38 am
Lily Says:

those are my girls, Yvonne and Tonya, and i
bringing back the 20’s itch on stage

Evil Disco was a pleasant surprise
and totally rocked my face
evidenced by the impromptu jazz hands picture

is that Michael swing dancing with Alexandra?
both looking lovely

picture of the nipple attack is awesome
from the guy, not the girl

October 15, 2007 at 10:47 am
Sexy Fitsum Says:

Well the girl did get an ovation …
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sexyfitsum/1571225243/

October 15, 2007 at 1:08 pm
Michael Says:

I missed titties? JFC.

October 15, 2007 at 1:35 pm
Taylor Says:

I hate to be the one to do this because I love BYT…but I don’t love the idea of putting girls up naked on the site. I often find Sexy Fitsum’s photos exploitative and creepy. This is a new low for him, in my humble opinion.

October 15, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

Well, let’s just say I rewrote my reply a few times …

I don’t think I’m any worse than this
http://www.ambrel.net/2007/0929-ratedx/index.html

There are exhibitionists and there are voyeurs. And I am one happy middleman. Be glad I don’t count on this for income, friend.

October 15, 2007 at 3:05 pm
Taylor Says:

No, your photos aren’t that bad. Hey, if people want to be photographed naked and you want to take the pictures, fine. But I just think it makes for less of a good time to have to worry about photographers that I don’t really trust (Joel, okay, but…) hanging around photographing girls. I don’t know the situation involved in that photo above…but I’ve been 22 and sweating and drunk and felt like undressing in clubs. And I certainly would have been mortified to find it on BYT on Monday morning. And I don’t want to have to start signing photo waivers every time I go to the Cat…wait times are long enough already. Also, if Dante or Jim Graham see this, we’re all f*cked.

October 15, 2007 at 3:19 pm
Michael Says:

At least keep it up until I can get home and see it.

After all the discussion I’m curious.

October 15, 2007 at 3:35 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

Oh… so it’s cool if Joel exploits your ass. I get it now …

Let alone the shots of the girl above, you don’t have even the slightest clue as to contexts in which I shoot. You should worry more about your personal behavior - eg. getting drunk and stripping at 22 - than signing waivers, or the guy who took the shot that reminded you come Monday AM of what a dumbass you were. Btw, did Cale’s pic of Michael squeezing his wad offend you also? Probably not.

Also, I really couldn’t give a rat’s puckered ass whether you think my photos are quality or not.

I’m curious what other people think. It’s obvious that - as always with my exploitative pix - BYT folks made a concious decision to post them. I’d just like to hear from some other people who haven’t made up their minds about me and how I do without the benefit of half a clue.

October 15, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Svetlana Says:

We’re keeping it up forever.
In all seriousness, I am all for keeping people’s chastity intact (insert my Don Rickles photo here) but if you decide to climb on a public stage, in front of a hundred people +1 and take not only your top but what seems MOST of your underpants off too, someone is going to take a picture.
And you will just have to deal with it.
And do 3 whiskey shots less next time.

October 15, 2007 at 3:38 pm
Michael Says:

I heart Svetlana.

I am also for more people climbing on public stages and taking off their tops and most of their underthings, but that’s much more an NYC thing to do and this certainly isn’t NYC.

I had my enormous ding-ding out at this very bar once on a dare, but there were no photographers about, so you’ll just have to trust it is an enormous ding-ding.

Er, make that twice.

October 15, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Marty Says:

it is a bit “girls gone wild” i gotta say. “we got 20 of the CRAZIEST DC HIPSTER GIRLS………………….”

my only real question is this: I see titties, but I don’t see Doug Stanhope. what gives?

October 15, 2007 at 3:58 pm
Taylor Says:

Hmmm…SF, your email above is a bit hard to follow, but I’ll try.

“You don’t have a clue as to contexts in which I shoot” - Ummm, yes I do. I’ve been to a lot of the parties / shows, etc. that you’ve photographed.

“You should worry more about your personal behavior - eg. getting drunk and stripping at 22″ - I’ve never stripped in a club. I only said I felt like it. And I’m not judging anyone who does it because I think it would be a very easy thing to do in a hot moment.

“or the guy who took the shot that reminded you come Monday AM of what a dumbass you were” - okay, that’s all I really needed. You’re calling that girl a “dumbass” which isn’t very respectful of the subject matter that’s getting all the attention for you today. It’s exploitative and mean - that’s my opinion. You don’t have to like it - but the fact that you’re calling her that and you’re the one that took the picture is pretty low.

“BYT folks made a concious decision to post them” - Agreed, they certainly did. And that’s fine - but its also fine for me to say I don’t like it.

“people who haven’t made up their minds about me and how I do without the benefit of half a clue” - again, I’ve seen your photos here - I’ve seen you out and interacting with people at events. I’m really not sure what else I need to know. I made a comment on your photos - and clearly, I’ve seen your photos.

As for Joel, yeah, I let him take my picture when he’s around. He’s a nice guy and a great photographer.

October 15, 2007 at 4:00 pm
Ben Says:

Oh, for fuck’s sake. The people crying for censorship are acting like a bunch of Republicans. Two people were shooting the event, both of which stood-out like sore thumbs with gigantic flashes, etc. The message was pretty clear: do something silly, and it’ll probably end up all over the internets.

This isn’t about exploitation. It’s about choices - this girl chose to undress and fuck a wall on a stage in front of several people, all while posing for the camera.

PS - she wasn’t even buck naked! It was just titties, with a side of ass. I mean, really. TITTIES! If people are this upset over boobs, I wonder what the full monty would do.

October 15, 2007 at 4:08 pm
Lily Says:

mmm, Michael’s pinstriped wad
with vest overlay
had to say it

these comments invite a strip-tease off
would have made a good contest at underwear party

October 15, 2007 at 4:10 pm
Cale Says:

As Doug Stanhope would say: “Show me where babies feed”

PS. anyone who didn’t go see Stanhope on Friday will sadly live the rest of their life with a little hole in their soul where his mushroom fueled rant on incentivizing vasectomies for rednecks should be. Truly one of the most amazing performances of any kind I have ever seen. I just hope he lives long enough to make it back to this neck of the woods again.

October 15, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

I wasn’t referring to the woman I shot as a dumbass. But you’re pretty happy to jump to conclusions. It doesn’t do me or any subject any bit of good to make them look like assholes. So I don’t. And in this case, I felt the girl made a concious decision to respond to me shooting her. That’s right: she wasn’t dancing like that until I pointed my camera toward her. So I made a concious decision shoot her and share the joy. That’s what I meant about you being clueless of the context.
You made up your mind about what was what, and that’s what I have a problem with.

Exploitation is exploitation whether by friend or Sexy Fitsum.

regarding Joel: trust me, I’ve heard “Don’t be a Joel” and “Well, at least you’re not like that dude Joel” way more often than “he’s a nice guy and a great photographer” It wouldnt be on blast if it werent true. Quit frankly Joel shoulldnt give a shit what people say bc there’s always some crybaby or two who feels the need to make free speech look like a bad idea.

October 15, 2007 at 4:35 pm
Taylor Says:

Cale, we saw Stanhope on Saturday as planned. There were several references to the mushroom incident. Sounds like you picked the right night. :)

October 15, 2007 at 4:44 pm
Cale Says:

I assume it was still a good time though right?

October 15, 2007 at 5:04 pm
Michael Says:

I forgot Cale took a picture of my (clothed) package.

Salivate, masses.

Oh and I saw that girl upstairs. She probably had the hots for me.

October 15, 2007 at 5:12 pm
Cale Says:

Also notice that I strategically placed Ironic’s reaction shot next to it

October 15, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Michael Says:

Which is his “Good god, just when I didn’t think he could be any sexier” look of course.

if people don’t want photos of the taken (or shown) a simple “could you please delete any pictures of me thanks” is all that is needed.

I bet you could totally get that girl to show off her baby factory exit if you asked SF.

October 15, 2007 at 5:36 pm
kingpinphoto Says:

woah…
how did I get all mixed up in this?

October 15, 2007 at 5:40 pm
Michael Says:

Because you haven’t sent the party photos of course.

October 15, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Cale Says:

Joel - we blame you for shit even when you’re out of town

Michael - “baby factory exit” is the second funniest thing you’ve ever said. I don’t remember what the first thing is though.

October 15, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

Great. Now I’ll have nightmares of tribbles

October 15, 2007 at 5:49 pm
Lily Says:

i second “baby factory exit”
great name for a band
or a record label
there i go with trademarks again

October 15, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Michael Says:

Cale - you can totally use it. It makes women damp.

October 15, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Michael Says:

Lily - you can use it too if I can name my band “Michael’s pinstriped wad”

October 15, 2007 at 6:00 pm
william Says:

i think this whole discussion is intended to distract from the fact that the point and shoot photos look like shit. how spoiled we get looking at joel’s pre-set filters week-in, week-out.

i love the way byt becomes a flamepostboard or whatever people call such things within seconds based on absolutely nothing. then michael mentions his penis size, which i think should be the subject of a separate byt fact-finding mission. put jeff and jason on the job, so that the police and at least one politician will be involved.

speaking of, why hasn’t byt inaugurated a film short thingy of jeff and jason doing stupid things. i think they’d be stars in no time. and michael could follow them around and try to reveal every episode. it could be like the mighty boosh, only, not fictional. they’re really like that:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I29IjrCY6Wc

chili chowder.

October 15, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Hey Sailor! Says:

How the hell did i miss the naked girl?!? Was i too busy panicking over the computer screen? Jeesus… I just hope she has no regrets, and I thank Dio that my friends make me keep me clothes on (or put them back on). Remember, this was just supposed to be a silly, trashy, fist in the air, rockfest. And rocknroll is supposed to be sexy! W.W.A.W.K.D.?

October 15, 2007 at 6:02 pm
Michael Says:

And here I thought William would get why I mention my penis size when things get ridiculous…

October 15, 2007 at 6:11 pm
Nate Says:

By Taylor:
“I don’t know the situation involved in that photo above…but I’ve been 22 and sweating and drunk and felt like undressing in clubs. And I certainly would have been mortified to find it on BYT on Monday morning.”

That girl was looking for dick. I arrived around 11, shortly before she walked up stairs. She sauntered around and continually looked like an all around hooker. I’m not joking when I’m saying I’ve only seen a girl who had a more “I want a dick in my vagina” look at a bar once in my life, a few weeks ago downstairs at Crap.

I wonder which guy/girl/tranny got drunk enough to go home with her. I feel sorry for them…

October 15, 2007 at 6:15 pm
Michael Says:

Nate:

Seconded. It was like a cock fell out of her and she was walking around wondering who had it so it could go back home.

As far as penis size: I tend to do it when people start arguing on the internets, because it’s just as ridiculous to state someone has a huge penis on the internet, where it doesn’t matter one fuck, as it is to argue on the internet and hope to change someone’s opinion.

In other words no matter how serious someone sounds, it’s just the same as talking about cock size.

Not that I don’t argue on the internet, but I never claimed to not be ridiculous.

October 15, 2007 at 6:27 pm
Lily Says:

you have my express permission to use the name
as long as i get free tickets and backstage access to any and all of your shows, for life

October 15, 2007 at 6:28 pm
Michael Says:

As an addendum: I am not criticizing the girl for showing her tits or wanting to get laid and making no shy bones about it. In fact more people who want to get laid should be as forward about it instead of game-playing.

I can’t stand game-playing.

So, no condemnation, just observation.

Lily - my backstage shenanigans would scar you for life I’m afraid. But I’ll sharpie-sign your chestitular area.

October 15, 2007 at 6:34 pm
Future Stepford Wife Says:

OMG! Like the same thing TOTALLY happened at Smith Point on Saturday! It’s all over the LNS forums — like, I bet it was the same girl! Was she wearing Lacoste undies?

October 15, 2007 at 6:50 pm
Cale Says:

Oh yeah, for the record - I made the editorial decision to post the photos of her cause I thought it was cool as shit that she busted that out at the Black Cat, not to make fun. I think DC could use more pubic nudity at its hipster parties.

October 15, 2007 at 7:09 pm
Torrey Says:

(I really hope HTML comments work.)

October 15, 2007 at 8:09 pm
Torrey Says:

…but they don’t so I leave you all with this link

http://dogtoe.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/arguing_on_the_internet.jpg

October 15, 2007 at 8:09 pm
Torrey Says:

Oh…and I second Nate and Michaels comments. That said unless there was a big sign that said, “Photography will be used at this event” or some such thing you might be in a perilous legal area by posting them without explicit permission.

October 15, 2007 at 8:11 pm
y-vonne Says:

Is it just me, or is “pubic nudity” the best Freudian slip ever?

That said, I personally am of the opinion that if you decide to flash your tits on camera in a public place, you assume the risk of all that comes with it, e.g. waking up the next morning to see those pictures on the internet. It’s still shaky ground legally, though, as she could argue that she was drunk and incapable of consenting to having semi-nude photos taken. Here’s hoping she doesn’t see these photos, regret whipping the girls out, and decide to sue, and also that Jim Graham, he who bans everything, doesn’t doesn’t get wind of this either.

October 15, 2007 at 8:58 pm
theholidaygirl Says:

Photographers can publish almost any photos they take - provided they don’t violate the privacy of an individual (or use them commercially without consent). The girl flashing the photographer had no reasonable expectation of privacy - and the Black Cat allows photographers to be there - so consent is implied.

http://www.kantor.com/blog/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf

October 15, 2007 at 8:59 pm
Rick Says:

I’ll save Torrey’s drunken noods while at the cat for when he’s running for office. You’ll see his albino minnow here first kiddies!
I agree with Cale. DC needs more ‘caught in the flashers’

October 15, 2007 at 8:59 pm
Nate Says:

The girl upstairs at mouse trap was FAR more scandalous anyways. She didn’t show her boobies/vagina/ass but that girl was semi-dry humping anything that had a heart beat…..and maybe some stuff that didn’t.

October 15, 2007 at 9:01 pm
Cale Says:

mmm… pubic nudity…

October 15, 2007 at 9:17 pm
Ben’s Friend Kate Says:

Pat Jarrett is baller.

October 15, 2007 at 11:06 pm
Torrey Says:

Nate: She was far more scandalous but far less nude. Much more amusing though….as one can tell by me laughing in the background in one of the photos.

October 15, 2007 at 11:16 pm
grace icon Says:

i’ve been photographed fullsmile halfnaked and this is a “take my photo” maneuver. it isn’t some tara reid omg my dress fell off or i’m so drunk i’m letting my clothes go, she’s definitely holding her dress up in search of fcking on the dance floor. hollys right there’s no expectation of a photographer taking her photo and keeping it under his bed for happy times
and Fits I agree Nikola has a handle for getting the party naked

October 16, 2007 at 12:03 am
Trip Bannister Says:

For the record, that bawdy strumpet was NOT at Smith Point this weekend. Nor would she EVER be invited into LNS. But while we’re at it:

“tag smoke titties.”

regards,

Trip

October 16, 2007 at 12:22 am
Lord Jason Says:

Jesus - is this what happens at the first Evil Disco I don’t attend in (literally) 9 months? Goddammit.

October 16, 2007 at 1:16 pm
Black Cat Says:

This woman was kicked out. We should have kicked the photographer out as well. We’d appreciate it if you took these pictures down.

October 16, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Lily Says:

seriously? gimme a break, i doubt the real BC has time to post comments on BYT, let alone bulletins from their myspace page, will the real BC please stand up? or show proof that they’re for real?

the next Crap, Evil Disco, Right Round, Sheebop, Bliss, Metapop, or other packed DJ dance party night, everyone should flash their boobies and other private regions and see if BC kicks us out

asshat

October 16, 2007 at 2:59 pm
Michael Says:

Lily- I’ve been waiting for you to to that forever.

October 16, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Cale Says:

We all have.

October 16, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

Although, her being kicked out would explain how she practically vanished after I stopped taking pix, I don’t think that’s what happenned.

Angie walked up to me and told me to stop shooting, pointed at the woman and made a “cut it out” gesture with her hand, then walked away. Then the woman did a Mary Elisabeth kate “Superstar” move, about 5 people clapped, then I walked over to where Kara was and started shooting the (love) notes people wrote her.

Not long after that, Angie came up and told me her problem was with the girl and not me; she just wanted me to stop shooting bc that was only encouraging her to keep stripping. She said I was all good and walked away. I’m sure she’d have no problem asking me to leave if it were like that.

Looking forward to this weekend

:p

October 16, 2007 at 3:35 pm
Old Dog Says:

If am man flashed his dick there would not be pictures of his penis on this website.

October 16, 2007 at 4:05 pm
Cale Says:

Who wants to test that theory out with Lily next time?

October 16, 2007 at 4:09 pm
Svetlana Says:

for the record photos of (devil’s) penis and man ass (with cigarette) have been posted on byt.

we’re all about equal opportunity smut around here.

October 16, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Lily Says:

that brings me to wonder if BC has a camera policy

one of my friends was taking pictures with a non-professional personal digital camera during Right Round or Metapop, i forget when, and some girl at the Black Cat told him to stop

he was nice, so he did
but it seemed completely unsubstantiated
he was just taking pictures of mostly our mutual friends
and fun people on the stage
not even flashing that much
what gives?

back to the subject at hand,
i’m all for the testing of theories
it supports science

October 16, 2007 at 4:30 pm
|m|andrew Says:

hahahahahahahahahahahaaha, that was the best comment stream I’ve read in a while, and wow possibly the worst boobs I’ve ever seen outside of that bad porno* your friend gives you when you’re thirteen and says check out these knockers. I’m glad mousetrap got free early, or that I was outside at that point of the night… mousetrap was almost good again for once, must be all the rowdy boiling back up to the top. Evil Disco is always a pleasure, and as always more danzig, and murder city devils please, because you can never have enough.

*Probably titled: Areola Borealis III the search for Spunk.

October 16, 2007 at 4:32 pm
Indeed, quite right. Says:

>heholidaygirl Says:

>I think the letters “NSFW” should be required

I’d like to second that - this can get those of use with stuffy day jobs fired.
I don’t want to be fired.
I like things like food and shelter.

BYT has labeled posts NSFW before (a giant wang in a movie review comes to mind), so…pretty please with a cherry on top - will you give us a NSFW heads up so the worker bees can still enjoy BYT during the day without worrying about getting canned?

October 16, 2007 at 11:26 pm
sexy fitsum and joel… Says:

are both old creepballs. neither of them are terribly talented. it’s not difficult to point and shoot photos that aren’t flattering. i could do the same thing with my canon powershot a520. where are the female party photographers at?

October 16, 2007 at 11:31 pm
Michael Says:

As the most unphotogenic person alive (So I’m not saying this to get more pictures of myself taken). I can’t stand pictures of myself (my wad, on the other hand, is a camera whore), however I think both Joel and SF do a pretty good job of not interrupting the flow, of being able to move in and out of a crowd and snap pictures on the spur, without stopping everything around them for poses (much of the time) and without taking a hell of a long time to take pictures and the shots typically come out just fine.

October 17, 2007 at 9:18 am
Ben Says:

Where are the female party photographers at? I DON’T KNOW. GRAB A CAMERA, HALFWIT. Stop trying to create yet ANOTHER argument out of this thread.

October 17, 2007 at 11:53 am
Sexy Fitsum Says:

I wonder what Taylor and the anonymous coward 2 posts above me think about the women who do the posing? Or this woman
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sexyfitsum/507101682/in/set-72157600237214011/
who’s in the process of asking me to shoot her making out with her friend. (Click on yo; the scene is hotter’n a mf)

And how about the gentlemen in this thread who basically called the chick at the Black Cat a cockneedy superwhore?

If those folks - Talyor, Black Cat and the anonymouse coward - aren’t equally offended by the above, it’s bc their feelings come from irrational half-baked issues that they *think* they have with me and Joel. When you call someone out like that, you have a responsibility to know what the feck you’re talking about. Any buttstain with half a lobe can burp out knee-jerk reactions. If it’s that important for you to make that point, how about you be a fair-minded and adult about it?

October 17, 2007 at 1:23 pm
Amanda Says:

i am offended by all of this. seriously. from the the drunk girl showing her boobs, to the people in this thread calling her a whore. to be honest, she looks more like a walking cry for help. how is that hot? she looks WASTED.

also, i am offended that the black cat - specifically dance parties at the black cat - have turned into such an “amateur hour” scene. yuck.

October 17, 2007 at 2:07 pm
Michael Says:

SF: technically while I did offer up that she seemed to be a cockneedy superwhore, I also qualified it by stating “I am not criticizing the girl for showing her tits or wanting to get laid and making no shy bones about it. In fact more people who want to get laid should be as forward about it instead of game-playing.”

See? I am a fan of cock-needy superwhores. Many girls are cock-needy superwhores, but they refuse to show it for fear of how others will perceive them. Guys, as we all know, would fuck a couch cushion if it would move on their own, but they don’t show it in public (mostly).

Decorum sucks.

Amanda - what’s wrong with drunk girls (and no one knows if she was drunk or was not am I right?) showing their boobs? As for “whore” see right above this where I addressed SF.

As far as amateur hour - well judging from the party photos I’ve seen from NYC we’re (thank fucking god) moving closer to their types.

hell who knows, maybe one day Entres Nous will be mainstream.

October 17, 2007 at 7:40 pm
C Says:

as far as legality is concerned, consent written or expressed in a public space is not required, unless the subject has not reached the age of majority, which she most definitely has.

It is an extra-legal situation, governed only by the lessons your mommy and daddy taught you. Is it nice to take naked pictures of distressed looking intoxicated girls? Cuz my momma always taught me it’s not.

everyone does stupid shit, especially under the influence of alcohol, especially in combination with other “things.” And it’s true that by drinking and flashing in front of a camera she takes on the risk of having someone post it on the internet. We all know the possible damage that can cause. it may be that this girl doesn’t care, but was that known or expressed by the respective parties at the time? So it’s not enough to say she was asking for whatever happens - nobody does. taking the picture wasn’t absolutely evil, not even close, but it’s def not in any moral no man’s land.

October 18, 2007 at 2:13 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

keep in mind that she didn’t start getting naked *until* I started shooting. up to that point, she looked like any person in the place who was just dancing. I have no interest in making anyone look or feel bad, trust me.

October 18, 2007 at 3:40 pm
Michael Says:

Agreed, SF.

Also does anyone know if she was drunk? Or are we all just assuming that if you show your tits in public you must be?

October 18, 2007 at 3:52 pm
Sexy Fitsum Says:

in the pix she looks glassy eyed, but she was totally not stumbling around or fumbling her fingers. the way she was dancing she would have fallen over at least once if she was lit like that.

so is this the longest thread in BYT history or what?

October 18, 2007 at 4:19 pm
you all suck Says:

you are all pathetic, with the exception of the ugly girl with the bologna tits and flabby ass.

October 18, 2007 at 10:46 pm
pedro Says:

Seriously why have I never read this site before, this shit is hilarious.

DC is so stuck up…in baltimore you actually have to whip out a naughty bit before they let you into the Depot fwiw.

your new biggest fan,

–pedro

October 20, 2007 at 5:04 pm
Episode #18 « Cro-Magnon Jazz Says:

[...] Sponsors: Science of Sleep Felt and Belch Brightest Young Things: Fashion Shit My New Fashion Hero No, the other kind of f’in vodka! Paid in Full (2.50$) [...]

October 21, 2007 at 10:45 pm
marybeee Says:

oh abbey i miss you

October 23, 2007 at 10:06 am
SketchyBack Says:

First of all titties are great. I hope that girl comes back naked next time and people take more pictures.

I’m also going to spray her with beer so she’s wet too.

October 28, 2007 at 3:18 pm