Previous Posts in Photos
- NYE @ RNR Hotel PHOTOS
- PHOTOS: Future Times Consciousness Event
- PHOTOS: Don’t Sweat (Shop) the Red Lounge (+THE Gibson)
- The Year in Photos Part 2
- PHOTOS: Garutachi CSS Afterparty
- PHOTOS: Another Rip Off
- PHOTOS: Round Robin Tour
- PHOTOS: Blisspop: Holiday Edi(c)tion
- The Year in Photos Part 1
- justduy(!): Feedback
- PHOTOS: TaxLo w/ Dave Nada + Pink Skull
- PHOTOS: Deep(est) Sugar @ Paradox
- Santa Photo Booth
- PHOTOS: Pavopalooza!
- Tim Gunn’s Holiday Party
- For Better or Worse: Vampire Weekend @ 930 Club
- PHOTOS: Big Sex at the 411
- PHOTOS: Your Winter in DURKL
- PHOTOS: Brazilian Night @ ST.EX
- Photos - Go Go Darky Sharko {Malaproppin.All Night}
- PHOTOS: Beaujolais!!
- PHOTOS: Tax Lo Mad Decent
- GAY DC: Annnd, Into the Lion’s Den!!!
- PHOTOS: Blisspop ft. Fort Knox 5
- Photos: Level Up @ Red Lounge
- Fixated on Fight Club
- Stop Smiling: The DC Issue
- PHOTOS: Sinden @ Tax Lo
- PHOTOS: Baltimored
- DIPLO fOOOOOOOl!
- Sweet Satisfaction: Deep Sugar at the Paradox
- PHOTOS: Hamiltonian Gallery
- PHOTOS REDUX: Dan Deacon
- Gallery Riche-in’ w/ Sinden (Hit me on my Beeper, Beeper!!)
- Stunning: Thomas Mueller @ Project 4
- Kings Of Leon: @ DAR and @ Pancake Mountain
- PHOTOS: Mountain Goats / Kaki King
- PHOTOS: New Party, New Club, ‘Producers, Labels & DJs’ @ Muse
- Photos: Scary Loda @ Gallery
- PHOTOS: Hirshhorn After Hours
- Photos: Bee’s Knees @ Velvet Lounge
- A Herculean Affair & Dance Party
- ELECTION NIGHT PHOTOS (a party to remember!!!)
- Vikings Deerhunting The Wolf of Aids
- PHOTOS from NYC: Rumspringa, Violens
- Hot and Heavy @ Hometown Heroes
- PHOTOS: Coldplay + Duffy @ Verizon Center
- PHOTOS: RAD! (Can You Kick It?)
- Rooftops, Hijinx and CMJ Redux
- My Baltimore Polaroids
Photos: Evil Disco / Mousetrap 10.13.2007
October 15, 2007 by Cale
Send to a Friend
Saturday night at The Cat: Mousetrap upstairs with the lovely ladies of My Favorite Dress guest DJing, and Evil Disco on the backstage, which as usual was mostly filled with people fist pumping and singing loudly instead of actually dancing. Not that I’m complaining. Oh, and some girl got naked. First off, we have some shots from Pat Jarrett, the newest member of our crack photography team:
And since Mousetrap DJ Mark Zimin nicely asked me to, here’s an old school point and shoot set, just like the old days when we weren’t all on the verge of being fired from our 9-5’s by spending so much time on BYT.
And last, but dear god certainly not least, Sexy Fitsum’s take on the night:
The one night I actually decide to go to a gay bar and I regret it.
October 15, 2007 at 10:31 amI think the letters “NSFW” should be required to be included in the introduction if nipples are coming. In a great big font. I totally missed the “some girl got naked” part & nearly spit out my latte/screamed when I was surprised by them.
Thanks to everybody who came out!
October 15, 2007 at 10:38 amthose are my girls, Yvonne and Tonya, and i
bringing back the 20’s itch on stage
Evil Disco was a pleasant surprise
and totally rocked my face
evidenced by the impromptu jazz hands picture
is that Michael swing dancing with Alexandra?
both looking lovely
picture of the nipple attack is awesome
from the guy, not the girl
Well the girl did get an ovation …
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sexyfitsum/1571225243/
I missed titties? JFC.
October 15, 2007 at 1:35 pmI hate to be the one to do this because I love BYT…but I don’t love the idea of putting girls up naked on the site. I often find Sexy Fitsum’s photos exploitative and creepy. This is a new low for him, in my humble opinion.
October 15, 2007 at 2:40 pmWell, let’s just say I rewrote my reply a few times …
I don’t think I’m any worse than this
http://www.ambrel.net/2007/0929-ratedx/index.html
There are exhibitionists and there are voyeurs. And I am one happy middleman. Be glad I don’t count on this for income, friend.
October 15, 2007 at 3:05 pmNo, your photos aren’t that bad. Hey, if people want to be photographed naked and you want to take the pictures, fine. But I just think it makes for less of a good time to have to worry about photographers that I don’t really trust (Joel, okay, but…) hanging around photographing girls. I don’t know the situation involved in that photo above…but I’ve been 22 and sweating and drunk and felt like undressing in clubs. And I certainly would have been mortified to find it on BYT on Monday morning. And I don’t want to have to start signing photo waivers every time I go to the Cat…wait times are long enough already. Also, if Dante or Jim Graham see this, we’re all f*cked.
October 15, 2007 at 3:19 pmAt least keep it up until I can get home and see it.
After all the discussion I’m curious.
October 15, 2007 at 3:35 pmOh… so it’s cool if Joel exploits your ass. I get it now …
Let alone the shots of the girl above, you don’t have even the slightest clue as to contexts in which I shoot. You should worry more about your personal behavior - eg. getting drunk and stripping at 22 - than signing waivers, or the guy who took the shot that reminded you come Monday AM of what a dumbass you were. Btw, did Cale’s pic of Michael squeezing his wad offend you also? Probably not.
Also, I really couldn’t give a rat’s puckered ass whether you think my photos are quality or not.
I’m curious what other people think. It’s obvious that - as always with my exploitative pix - BYT folks made a concious decision to post them. I’d just like to hear from some other people who haven’t made up their minds about me and how I do without the benefit of half a clue.
October 15, 2007 at 3:37 pmWe’re keeping it up forever.
In all seriousness, I am all for keeping people’s chastity intact (insert my Don Rickles photo here) but if you decide to climb on a public stage, in front of a hundred people +1 and take not only your top but what seems MOST of your underpants off too, someone is going to take a picture.
And you will just have to deal with it.
And do 3 whiskey shots less next time.
I heart Svetlana.
I am also for more people climbing on public stages and taking off their tops and most of their underthings, but that’s much more an NYC thing to do and this certainly isn’t NYC.
I had my enormous ding-ding out at this very bar once on a dare, but there were no photographers about, so you’ll just have to trust it is an enormous ding-ding.
Er, make that twice.
October 15, 2007 at 3:43 pmit is a bit “girls gone wild” i gotta say. “we got 20 of the CRAZIEST DC HIPSTER GIRLS………………….”
my only real question is this: I see titties, but I don’t see Doug Stanhope. what gives?
October 15, 2007 at 3:58 pmHmmm…SF, your email above is a bit hard to follow, but I’ll try.
“You don’t have a clue as to contexts in which I shoot” - Ummm, yes I do. I’ve been to a lot of the parties / shows, etc. that you’ve photographed.
“You should worry more about your personal behavior - eg. getting drunk and stripping at 22″ - I’ve never stripped in a club. I only said I felt like it. And I’m not judging anyone who does it because I think it would be a very easy thing to do in a hot moment.
“or the guy who took the shot that reminded you come Monday AM of what a dumbass you were” - okay, that’s all I really needed. You’re calling that girl a “dumbass” which isn’t very respectful of the subject matter that’s getting all the attention for you today. It’s exploitative and mean - that’s my opinion. You don’t have to like it - but the fact that you’re calling her that and you’re the one that took the picture is pretty low.
“BYT folks made a concious decision to post them” - Agreed, they certainly did. And that’s fine - but its also fine for me to say I don’t like it.
“people who haven’t made up their minds about me and how I do without the benefit of half a clue” - again, I’ve seen your photos here - I’ve seen you out and interacting with people at events. I’m really not sure what else I need to know. I made a comment on your photos - and clearly, I’ve seen your photos.
As for Joel, yeah, I let him take my picture when he’s around. He’s a nice guy and a great photographer.
October 15, 2007 at 4:00 pmOh, for fuck’s sake. The people crying for censorship are acting like a bunch of Republicans. Two people were shooting the event, both of which stood-out like sore thumbs with gigantic flashes, etc. The message was pretty clear: do something silly, and it’ll probably end up all over the internets.
This isn’t about exploitation. It’s about choices - this girl chose to undress and fuck a wall on a stage in front of several people, all while posing for the camera.
PS - she wasn’t even buck naked! It was just titties, with a side of ass. I mean, really. TITTIES! If people are this upset over boobs, I wonder what the full monty would do.
October 15, 2007 at 4:08 pmmmm, Michael’s pinstriped wad
with vest overlay
had to say it
these comments invite a strip-tease off
would have made a good contest at underwear party
As Doug Stanhope would say: “Show me where babies feed”
PS. anyone who didn’t go see Stanhope on Friday will sadly live the rest of their life with a little hole in their soul where his mushroom fueled rant on incentivizing vasectomies for rednecks should be. Truly one of the most amazing performances of any kind I have ever seen. I just hope he lives long enough to make it back to this neck of the woods again.
October 15, 2007 at 4:28 pmI wasn’t referring to the woman I shot as a dumbass. But you’re pretty happy to jump to conclusions. It doesn’t do me or any subject any bit of good to make them look like assholes. So I don’t. And in this case, I felt the girl made a concious decision to respond to me shooting her. That’s right: she wasn’t dancing like that until I pointed my camera toward her. So I made a concious decision shoot her and share the joy. That’s what I meant about you being clueless of the context.
You made up your mind about what was what, and that’s what I have a problem with.
Exploitation is exploitation whether by friend or Sexy Fitsum.
regarding Joel: trust me, I’ve heard “Don’t be a Joel” and “Well, at least you’re not like that dude Joel” way more often than “he’s a nice guy and a great photographer” It wouldnt be on blast if it werent true. Quit frankly Joel shoulldnt give a shit what people say bc there’s always some crybaby or two who feels the need to make free speech look like a bad idea.
October 15, 2007 at 4:35 pmCale, we saw Stanhope on Saturday as planned. There were several references to the mushroom incident. Sounds like you picked the right night. :)
October 15, 2007 at 4:44 pmI assume it was still a good time though right?
October 15, 2007 at 5:04 pmI forgot Cale took a picture of my (clothed) package.
Salivate, masses.
Oh and I saw that girl upstairs. She probably had the hots for me.
October 15, 2007 at 5:12 pmAlso notice that I strategically placed Ironic’s reaction shot next to it
October 15, 2007 at 5:16 pmWhich is his “Good god, just when I didn’t think he could be any sexier” look of course.
if people don’t want photos of the taken (or shown) a simple “could you please delete any pictures of me thanks” is all that is needed.
I bet you could totally get that girl to show off her baby factory exit if you asked SF.
October 15, 2007 at 5:36 pmwoah…
how did I get all mixed up in this?
Because you haven’t sent the party photos of course.
October 15, 2007 at 5:42 pmJoel - we blame you for shit even when you’re out of town
Michael - “baby factory exit” is the second funniest thing you’ve ever said. I don’t remember what the first thing is though.
October 15, 2007 at 5:43 pmGreat. Now I’ll have nightmares of tribbles
October 15, 2007 at 5:49 pmi second “baby factory exit”
great name for a band
or a record label
there i go with trademarks again
Cale - you can totally use it. It makes women damp.
October 15, 2007 at 5:59 pmLily - you can use it too if I can name my band “Michael’s pinstriped wad”
October 15, 2007 at 6:00 pmi think this whole discussion is intended to distract from the fact that the point and shoot photos look like shit. how spoiled we get looking at joel’s pre-set filters week-in, week-out.
i love the way byt becomes a flamepostboard or whatever people call such things within seconds based on absolutely nothing. then michael mentions his penis size, which i think should be the subject of a separate byt fact-finding mission. put jeff and jason on the job, so that the police and at least one politician will be involved.
speaking of, why hasn’t byt inaugurated a film short thingy of jeff and jason doing stupid things. i think they’d be stars in no time. and michael could follow them around and try to reveal every episode. it could be like the mighty boosh, only, not fictional. they’re really like that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I29IjrCY6Wc
chili chowder.
October 15, 2007 at 6:01 pmHow the hell did i miss the naked girl?!? Was i too busy panicking over the computer screen? Jeesus… I just hope she has no regrets, and I thank Dio that my friends make me keep me clothes on (or put them back on). Remember, this was just supposed to be a silly, trashy, fist in the air, rockfest. And rocknroll is supposed to be sexy! W.W.A.W.K.D.?
October 15, 2007 at 6:02 pmAnd here I thought William would get why I mention my penis size when things get ridiculous…
October 15, 2007 at 6:11 pmBy Taylor:
“I don’t know the situation involved in that photo above…but I’ve been 22 and sweating and drunk and felt like undressing in clubs. And I certainly would have been mortified to find it on BYT on Monday morning.”
That girl was looking for dick. I arrived around 11, shortly before she walked up stairs. She sauntered around and continually looked like an all around hooker. I’m not joking when I’m saying I’ve only seen a girl who had a more “I want a dick in my vagina” look at a bar once in my life, a few weeks ago downstairs at Crap.
I wonder which guy/girl/tranny got drunk enough to go home with her. I feel sorry for them…
October 15, 2007 at 6:15 pmNate:
Seconded. It was like a cock fell out of her and she was walking around wondering who had it so it could go back home.
As far as penis size: I tend to do it when people start arguing on the internets, because it’s just as ridiculous to state someone has a huge penis on the internet, where it doesn’t matter one fuck, as it is to argue on the internet and hope to change someone’s opinion.
In other words no matter how serious someone sounds, it’s just the same as talking about cock size.
Not that I don’t argue on the internet, but I never claimed to not be ridiculous.
October 15, 2007 at 6:27 pmyou have my express permission to use the name
as long as i get free tickets and backstage access to any and all of your shows, for life
As an addendum: I am not criticizing the girl for showing her tits or wanting to get laid and making no shy bones about it. In fact more people who want to get laid should be as forward about it instead of game-playing.
I can’t stand game-playing.
So, no condemnation, just observation.
Lily - my backstage shenanigans would scar you for life I’m afraid. But I’ll sharpie-sign your chestitular area.
October 15, 2007 at 6:34 pmOMG! Like the same thing TOTALLY happened at Smith Point on Saturday! It’s all over the LNS forums — like, I bet it was the same girl! Was she wearing Lacoste undies?
October 15, 2007 at 6:50 pmOh yeah, for the record - I made the editorial decision to post the photos of her cause I thought it was cool as shit that she busted that out at the Black Cat, not to make fun. I think DC could use more pubic nudity at its hipster parties.
October 15, 2007 at 7:09 pm(I really hope HTML comments work.)
October 15, 2007 at 8:09 pm…but they don’t so I leave you all with this link
http://dogtoe.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/arguing_on_the_internet.jpg
October 15, 2007 at 8:09 pmOh…and I second Nate and Michaels comments. That said unless there was a big sign that said, “Photography will be used at this event” or some such thing you might be in a perilous legal area by posting them without explicit permission.
October 15, 2007 at 8:11 pmIs it just me, or is “pubic nudity” the best Freudian slip ever?
That said, I personally am of the opinion that if you decide to flash your tits on camera in a public place, you assume the risk of all that comes with it, e.g. waking up the next morning to see those pictures on the internet. It’s still shaky ground legally, though, as she could argue that she was drunk and incapable of consenting to having semi-nude photos taken. Here’s hoping she doesn’t see these photos, regret whipping the girls out, and decide to sue, and also that Jim Graham, he who bans everything, doesn’t doesn’t get wind of this either.
October 15, 2007 at 8:58 pmPhotographers can publish almost any photos they take - provided they don’t violate the privacy of an individual (or use them commercially without consent). The girl flashing the photographer had no reasonable expectation of privacy - and the Black Cat allows photographers to be there - so consent is implied.
http://www.kantor.com/blog/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf
October 15, 2007 at 8:59 pmI’ll save Torrey’s drunken noods while at the cat for when he’s running for office. You’ll see his albino minnow here first kiddies!
I agree with Cale. DC needs more ‘caught in the flashers’
The girl upstairs at mouse trap was FAR more scandalous anyways. She didn’t show her boobies/vagina/ass but that girl was semi-dry humping anything that had a heart beat…..and maybe some stuff that didn’t.
October 15, 2007 at 9:01 pmmmm… pubic nudity…
October 15, 2007 at 9:17 pmPat Jarrett is baller.
October 15, 2007 at 11:06 pmNate: She was far more scandalous but far less nude. Much more amusing though….as one can tell by me laughing in the background in one of the photos.
October 15, 2007 at 11:16 pmi’ve been photographed fullsmile halfnaked and this is a “take my photo” maneuver. it isn’t some tara reid omg my dress fell off or i’m so drunk i’m letting my clothes go, she’s definitely holding her dress up in search of fcking on the dance floor. hollys right there’s no expectation of a photographer taking her photo and keeping it under his bed for happy times
and Fits I agree Nikola has a handle for getting the party naked
For the record, that bawdy strumpet was NOT at Smith Point this weekend. Nor would she EVER be invited into LNS. But while we’re at it:
“tag smoke titties.”
regards,
Trip
October 16, 2007 at 12:22 amJesus - is this what happens at the first Evil Disco I don’t attend in (literally) 9 months? Goddammit.
October 16, 2007 at 1:16 pmThis woman was kicked out. We should have kicked the photographer out as well. We’d appreciate it if you took these pictures down.
October 16, 2007 at 2:30 pmseriously? gimme a break, i doubt the real BC has time to post comments on BYT, let alone bulletins from their myspace page, will the real BC please stand up? or show proof that they’re for real?
the next Crap, Evil Disco, Right Round, Sheebop, Bliss, Metapop, or other packed DJ dance party night, everyone should flash their boobies and other private regions and see if BC kicks us out
asshat
October 16, 2007 at 2:59 pmLily- I’ve been waiting for you to to that forever.
October 16, 2007 at 3:02 pmWe all have.
October 16, 2007 at 3:08 pmAlthough, her being kicked out would explain how she practically vanished after I stopped taking pix, I don’t think that’s what happenned.
Angie walked up to me and told me to stop shooting, pointed at the woman and made a “cut it out” gesture with her hand, then walked away. Then the woman did a Mary Elisabeth kate “Superstar” move, about 5 people clapped, then I walked over to where Kara was and started shooting the (love) notes people wrote her.
Not long after that, Angie came up and told me her problem was with the girl and not me; she just wanted me to stop shooting bc that was only encouraging her to keep stripping. She said I was all good and walked away. I’m sure she’d have no problem asking me to leave if it were like that.
Looking forward to this weekend
:p
October 16, 2007 at 3:35 pmIf am man flashed his dick there would not be pictures of his penis on this website.
October 16, 2007 at 4:05 pmWho wants to test that theory out with Lily next time?
October 16, 2007 at 4:09 pmfor the record photos of (devil’s) penis and man ass (with cigarette) have been posted on byt.
we’re all about equal opportunity smut around here.
October 16, 2007 at 4:11 pmthat brings me to wonder if BC has a camera policy
one of my friends was taking pictures with a non-professional personal digital camera during Right Round or Metapop, i forget when, and some girl at the Black Cat told him to stop
he was nice, so he did
but it seemed completely unsubstantiated
he was just taking pictures of mostly our mutual friends
and fun people on the stage
not even flashing that much
what gives?
back to the subject at hand,
i’m all for the testing of theories
it supports science
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha, that was the best comment stream I’ve read in a while, and wow possibly the worst boobs I’ve ever seen outside of that bad porno* your friend gives you when you’re thirteen and says check out these knockers. I’m glad mousetrap got free early, or that I was outside at that point of the night… mousetrap was almost good again for once, must be all the rowdy boiling back up to the top. Evil Disco is always a pleasure, and as always more danzig, and murder city devils please, because you can never have enough.
*Probably titled: Areola Borealis III the search for Spunk.
October 16, 2007 at 4:32 pm>heholidaygirl Says:
>I think the letters “NSFW” should be required
I’d like to second that - this can get those of use with stuffy day jobs fired.
I don’t want to be fired.
I like things like food and shelter.
BYT has labeled posts NSFW before (a giant wang in a movie review comes to mind), so…pretty please with a cherry on top - will you give us a NSFW heads up so the worker bees can still enjoy BYT during the day without worrying about getting canned?
October 16, 2007 at 11:26 pmare both old creepballs. neither of them are terribly talented. it’s not difficult to point and shoot photos that aren’t flattering. i could do the same thing with my canon powershot a520. where are the female party photographers at?
October 16, 2007 at 11:31 pmAs the most unphotogenic person alive (So I’m not saying this to get more pictures of myself taken). I can’t stand pictures of myself (my wad, on the other hand, is a camera whore), however I think both Joel and SF do a pretty good job of not interrupting the flow, of being able to move in and out of a crowd and snap pictures on the spur, without stopping everything around them for poses (much of the time) and without taking a hell of a long time to take pictures and the shots typically come out just fine.
October 17, 2007 at 9:18 amWhere are the female party photographers at? I DON’T KNOW. GRAB A CAMERA, HALFWIT. Stop trying to create yet ANOTHER argument out of this thread.
October 17, 2007 at 11:53 amI wonder what Taylor and the anonymous coward 2 posts above me think about the women who do the posing? Or this woman
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sexyfitsum/507101682/in/set-72157600237214011/
who’s in the process of asking me to shoot her making out with her friend. (Click on yo; the scene is hotter’n a mf)
And how about the gentlemen in this thread who basically called the chick at the Black Cat a cockneedy superwhore?
If those folks - Talyor, Black Cat and the anonymouse coward - aren’t equally offended by the above, it’s bc their feelings come from irrational half-baked issues that they *think* they have with me and Joel. When you call someone out like that, you have a responsibility to know what the feck you’re talking about. Any buttstain with half a lobe can burp out knee-jerk reactions. If it’s that important for you to make that point, how about you be a fair-minded and adult about it?
October 17, 2007 at 1:23 pmi am offended by all of this. seriously. from the the drunk girl showing her boobs, to the people in this thread calling her a whore. to be honest, she looks more like a walking cry for help. how is that hot? she looks WASTED.
also, i am offended that the black cat - specifically dance parties at the black cat - have turned into such an “amateur hour” scene. yuck.
October 17, 2007 at 2:07 pmSF: technically while I did offer up that she seemed to be a cockneedy superwhore, I also qualified it by stating “I am not criticizing the girl for showing her tits or wanting to get laid and making no shy bones about it. In fact more people who want to get laid should be as forward about it instead of game-playing.”
See? I am a fan of cock-needy superwhores. Many girls are cock-needy superwhores, but they refuse to show it for fear of how others will perceive them. Guys, as we all know, would fuck a couch cushion if it would move on their own, but they don’t show it in public (mostly).
Decorum sucks.
Amanda - what’s wrong with drunk girls (and no one knows if she was drunk or was not am I right?) showing their boobs? As for “whore” see right above this where I addressed SF.
As far as amateur hour - well judging from the party photos I’ve seen from NYC we’re (thank fucking god) moving closer to their types.
hell who knows, maybe one day Entres Nous will be mainstream.
October 17, 2007 at 7:40 pmas far as legality is concerned, consent written or expressed in a public space is not required, unless the subject has not reached the age of majority, which she most definitely has.
It is an extra-legal situation, governed only by the lessons your mommy and daddy taught you. Is it nice to take naked pictures of distressed looking intoxicated girls? Cuz my momma always taught me it’s not.
everyone does stupid shit, especially under the influence of alcohol, especially in combination with other “things.” And it’s true that by drinking and flashing in front of a camera she takes on the risk of having someone post it on the internet. We all know the possible damage that can cause. it may be that this girl doesn’t care, but was that known or expressed by the respective parties at the time? So it’s not enough to say she was asking for whatever happens - nobody does. taking the picture wasn’t absolutely evil, not even close, but it’s def not in any moral no man’s land.
October 18, 2007 at 2:13 pmkeep in mind that she didn’t start getting naked *until* I started shooting. up to that point, she looked like any person in the place who was just dancing. I have no interest in making anyone look or feel bad, trust me.
October 18, 2007 at 3:40 pmAgreed, SF.
Also does anyone know if she was drunk? Or are we all just assuming that if you show your tits in public you must be?
October 18, 2007 at 3:52 pmin the pix she looks glassy eyed, but she was totally not stumbling around or fumbling her fingers. the way she was dancing she would have fallen over at least once if she was lit like that.
so is this the longest thread in BYT history or what?
October 18, 2007 at 4:19 pmyou are all pathetic, with the exception of the ugly girl with the bologna tits and flabby ass.
October 18, 2007 at 10:46 pmSeriously why have I never read this site before, this shit is hilarious.
DC is so stuck up…in baltimore you actually have to whip out a naughty bit before they let you into the Depot fwiw.
your new biggest fan,
–pedro
October 20, 2007 at 5:04 pm[...] Sponsors: Science of Sleep Felt and Belch Brightest Young Things: Fashion Shit My New Fashion Hero No, the other kind of f’in vodka! Paid in Full (2.50$) [...]
October 21, 2007 at 10:45 pmoh abbey i miss you
October 23, 2007 at 10:06 amFirst of all titties are great. I hope that girl comes back naked next time and people take more pictures.
I’m also going to spray her with beer so she’s wet too.
October 28, 2007 at 3:18 pm






























































































Do I detect a halfsmile on Grace?
October 15, 2007 at 10:07 am