Judging a Cover By Its Cover: Chris Walla “Field Manual”
February 20, 2008 by John Foster
Send to a Friend
John Foster takes music packaging very seriously. He has deconstructed the design of the recording industry through his personal work and his books, Maximum Page Design (HOW), New Masters of Poster Design (Rockport) and the upcoming For Sale: Innovative Solutions in Packaging Design (HOW) as well as a monograph of Sub Pop’s Art Director, Jeff Kleinsmith, slated for publication by the label in 2008.
He will be poking and prodding various albums on a weekly basis so please be sure to keep an eye out!
This week’s victims:
Chris Walla “Field Manual”
Is it worth listening to no matter what it looks like? Walla famously sent these tunes on a hard drive over the border from Canada via courier, only to have the drive confiscated. Luckily he had all the files still on his computer. Now was it lucky for the listener? Well… much like the actual rough mixes the Department of Homeland Security discovered on the drive they took hold of – it is ultimately benign. Walla has been working on the disc for quite some time but you are still left thinking that he saved his best work for his day job in Death Cab for Cutie (and perhaps rightly so.) It isn’t fair to compare this to Ben Gibbard’s other side projects, as this really is a different animal. Clearly a lot of craft went in to constructing these songs from a sonic standpoint. The lush layered vocal that kicks off the disc on “Two-Fifty” alerts you to that immediately. While this approach may make for an interesting listen, it is a hollow one in the end. Call me old-fashioned (you’re old fashioned!) but I would rather hear something rough around the edges where all of the time was spent in crafting the actual song as opposed to layers of clean sound that amount to little. Even the crunch of “The Score” is antiseptic in a “radio emo” sort of way. The junior high lyrics (always a Death Cab weakness) don’t help either.
Let me be clear on this matter. I am not a Death Cab hater by any means. I think they turn out 2-4 really solid songs per album. But when you “read” their songs it does them no favors. Before anyone runs to their defense, let me give you a yarn from “Archer v. Light” courtesy of Mister Walla. “Oh, dear Sir, I’m a librarian, and while I do not know of law, I know the things that make my stomach pitch and yaw.” It actually gets worse from there but I can’t stand the thought of typing it out.
If you think Death Cab would be well served by putting out the less pop portions of their albums with a bland singer this is right up your alley. For the rest of us, we can wait on the new Postal Service record (and I said I wouldn’t do it – oh well.)
Credit: “Design and layout by Tony Secolo for officepdx.com. Photos by Walla”
Any signs of creative interference in the design process by the artist? I am inclined to say this is a collaboration based on the final result. I also couldn’t help noticing Secolo doing a new logo for the band and Walla adding photos to the Office site.
Does the look fit the sound? I really enjoy the work of Office for the most part. I even judged their corporate ID set into the recent HOW International Design Annual. The design for “Field Manual” is nice and inoffensive but little more. Not as daring as their work I have seen before. The typography is well done and refined; the color palette solid; the layout “fine;” Do you see where this is headed? Even Walla’s photos are just sort of plain and nice. Even the UPC is laid out in a simple non-offensive fashion. They incorporate a spot UV varnish on the cover but it isn’t used for anything other than enhancement of the nice shade of red selected for the type and flower. In unspectacular fashion, the packaging actually perfectly suits the music contained within.
Final score (out of 10): 5.0 – right down the middle

I can see where Lissy is coming from but let me address this. I haven’t read a thing about this album other than the news when the hard drive was confiscated. No reviews etc… Anyone that has read my column or books etc… should know that I am far too bull headed (and lazy in weird way) to co-opt someone else’s opinion. I also have a long history of love affairs with unpopular music so I am not biased by the common outlook one way or the other (see my knock around of Vampire Weekend last week.)
Specific to Walla - I like all types of music from singer songwriters with every string squeak recorded (see Holopaw column) to noise rock (Aids Wolf review) and waaaay over-produced pop (High School Musical column AND review - man that sounds bad together - haha.) I don’t care WHAT he sounds like. Just that he drapes that sound on viable songs that have something to hang your hat on. What he ultimately put out is sketches for songs that never seem to find the song within them and he keeps layering on and somehow knows they aren’t done but packs it up anyway.
Trust me when I say these wouldn’t be any better if just played on an acoustic. It would also be a disservice to the reader to not comment on the obvious studio work entailed here. Also, if you have a discography behind you it is always going to come into play when evaluating your current work.
Your last comment sort of hits it on the head for me - he sounds like a producer/musician to me - its the “crafted” part that is missing something. Making the lazy reference to Postal Service is still apt as Jimmy Tamborello is basically what you are claiming Walla has done here - studio-crafted sonic palettes with rewarding songs. The list of folks I think excel in making music in that manner is long long long - Walla just hasn’t made it there yet.
Sooo I can see what you mean but I don’t think this is the right place to direct it.
February 21, 2008 at 4:37 pmHa - I just wrote that long reply when I should have just said the point is he should have spent more time on the “writing” part of song writing.
February 21, 2008 at 4:41 pmWilco is on for next week and then I will veer off the singer songwriter path for at least a week - promise!
February 22, 2008 at 4:11 pm

What I don’t understand is the focus/expectation of raw, fringed heavily crafted songwriting songwriting - when the mans talent is and has always been production and playing- I think its a bit distraction to focus on what he isn’t offering you… this review- and the rest of the media- seems to be looking for something to rip apart from this sucessful member of DCFC thinking he might be able to present a creative little something or other on his own. There’ a lot of raw songwriters doing their thing- is that all we are looking for!?!
You have musicians like Chris Walla and labels like SubPop who know how to make use of that /layer it/crash it…. so it doesn’t like the next guy…then the next guy…then the next guy and everybody else who owns a guitar and can conjur up a melody at the open mic.
It’s always easy to rip on someone who’s been successful and when they take a gamble and try out their own tunes. I am entirely frustrated by the Press/reviewers taking a cheap shot as Walla steps out for a split second. Three Cheers for Paste having a mind of their own.
how dare he think he can be successful as a solo artist. he doesn’t sound like a crafted singer songwriter!?! he sounds like a crafterd producer/musician…. how refreshing.
come on now.
February 21, 2008 at 3:52 pm